• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman, a Premier California Defense Firm

For the Best Defense

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Esq., Founder and Managing Partner
    • Yan Falkinstein, Esq. MBA, Partner & Managing Attorney
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Esq., Founder and Managing Partner
    • Yan Falkinstein, Esq. MBA, Partner & Managing Attorney
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

Our team of exceptional attorneys and support staff are ready to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns.

(818) 707-1488

Never Stipulate to Maximum Earnings: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

October 12, 2022 //  by Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman//  Leave a Comment

Without a doubt, it is a major error whenever a claims professional stipulates to an injured workers’ Average Weekly Wage (AWW) being “maximum”, even though maximum earnings may exist. The AWW should always be identified as a specific dollar figure instead of taking a shortcut by stating “maximum.” The reason is quite simple. Although the injured worker may be a maximum earner today, it doesn’t mean he or she will be a maximum earner tomorrow.

Allow us to provide a horror story of what happened to a claims administrator who took a shortcut by stipulating to “maximum” earnings instead of identifying a dollar figure.

The worker was injured in December 2017 with an AWW of $1,800, which was $41.15 above the amount needed to qualify for maximum TD benefits. When settling the case, the claims administrator stipulated to maximum earnings instead of $1,800.

In 2021 the applicant reopened the claim to undergo surgery. TD was once again owed due to surgery and TD benefits were still available as the 104-week limitation had not been exhausted. In addition, the two-year TD rule under LC §4661.5 now applied. To qualify for maximum TD benefits in 2021 an AWW of at least $2,034.46 was required. Despite the applicant’s AWW being only $1,800, he nevertheless was awarded TD at the current maximum rate because pursuant to the stipulations he was a maximum earner.

Wait! It gets worse, much worse. The applicant died as a result of a post-surgical infection. He was survived by a disabled minor child, who was now entitled to lifetime death benefits. Because of the “maximum” earnings stipulation, death benefits were ordered at the maximum TD rate each year for the rest of the child’s life thanks to the annual COLA increase and LC §4661.5. It is projected that this blunder of identifying the AWW as “maximum,” as opposed to $1,800.00, will end up costing the employer an estimated $2.5 million extra over the life of the claim!

The moral of the story is never stipulate to “maximum” earnings. Always identify a dollar figure.

Category: Legal, Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' CompensationTag: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Maximum Earnings, Sixty-Second Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Stipulations, Work Comp, Workers' Compensation, Workers' Compensation Claims, Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' Compensation Defense

You May Also Be Interested In:

Marla Shah Named as Partner

Sheena Ghassemi Named as Partner

Yan Falkinstein Named as Partner

The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman Welcomes New Managing Attorney to Lead Workers’ Compensation Practice

Announcement of Firm Name Change

Overriding UR: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Lump Sum PDAs: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Investigating Dependency: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: DNA Evidence in Work Comp: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
View All Locations

Contact Us

Our team of expert attorneys and support staff are ready to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns.
Contact Us Today

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman hopes that the information contained in this website is useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman, and The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Offices of Heywood G. Friedman.

Copyright © 2026 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in