• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • In Memory of Paul Lee
  • Contact
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • In Memory of Paul Lee
  • Contact
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

DNA Evidence in Work Comp: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

October 19, 2022 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

In death benefit claims dependency is a threshold issue, and when paternity is uncertain, it can be a major one. For example: we are aware of a case where a decedent’s ex-girlfriend sought death benefits on behalf of her minor child. DNA testing became necessary as the child’s birth certificate was deemed inadequate proof of paternity. DNA testing was preferable because birth certificates have been known to contain erroneous information.

Have you ever wondered what happens in a death claim where DNA testing is required but the decedent has been cremated? When direct DNA is no longer available an alternative method is allowed to determine paternity involving DNA testing of paternal grandparent(s). Although the results will not be as conclusive as testing the actual decedent, it nevertheless is a permissible option.

With that said, it is imperative that DNA testing be conducted by a reputable lab. Appropriate measures must be in place to avoid contamination of samples that can produce tainted results. For the most part DNA testing is accurate but errors do occur when laboratory practices fail to adhere to the professional standards established for this field of diagnostic medicine.

It may come as a surprise that when a DNA test is conducted involving a child and one or both paternal grandparents, the child’s mother must also be tested. Many applicant attorneys react in utter disbelief when a request is made for the mother to join the grandparent(s) for testing, as they view the request as harassment. In reality, their reaction is nothing more than a reflection of their unfamiliarity with DNA testing procedures. The mother’s DNA is an integral component in determining the biological identity of the child’s grandparents. We have actually seen an applicant attorney become so enraged over a request to test the mother that he threatened penalties, although the basis therefor is uncertain as DNA testing is not mentioned in the Labor Code. Without going into a detailed explanation of the science behind DNA testing procedures, suffice it to say the test results will be more accurate with the mother’s participation. Again, we are not testing her to see whether she is the mother, but instead, her DNA is required to determine if the grandparents are biologically related to the child. Interestingly enough, in the case where the applicant’s attorney was enraged, two DNA tests were performed, one with the mother’s involvement and the other without. Ironically, applicant attorney was embarrassed by the findings. Without the mother’s DNA the grandparent’s test result came back with 92.5% probability. However, with the mother’s involvement the result increased to a 98.4% probability of grandparentage.

In closing, DNA is an extremely useful diagnostic tool if interpreted properly. In one case where paternal grandparents were tested to determine whether their deceased son was the father of a minor child, the results came back with a 0% probability of the grandfather being the child’s grandparent. Normally such results would have ended the work comp case right there as genetically, his deceased son could not have fathered the child. The case was about to be dismissed until applicant attorney noticed that the paternal grandmother’s test result came back with a 98.5% probability of being the child’s grandmother. Based on the grandmother’s DNA test results, death benefits were awarded to the child. As for the grandfather, he was surprised to learn that he was not the biological father of his deceased son, thus explaining why there was a 0% probability of him being the grandparent of the minor child.

Category: Legal, Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' CompensationTag: 60-Second Seminar, A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, DNA, DNA Evidence, Sixty-Second Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Work Comp, Workers' Compensation, Workers' Compensation Claims, Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' Compensation Defense

You May Also Be Interested In:

True Claim Stories: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

In Memory of Paul Lee, Esq.

First Aid: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Commutations: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Surveillance: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Workers’ Compensation Nurses: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

LC 5710 Attorney Fees: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Petition for Contribution: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The 24-Visit Cap: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Never Stipulate to Maximum Earnings: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: Home Health Care Attendant: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Business Litigation
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • Insurance Law
  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no better time than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2023 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in