• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

Piggyback MSAs: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

March 23, 2022 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

Today’s sixty-second blog can easily save a company a few hundred thousand dollars in just one workers’ compensation claim. You won’t believe how simple it is. We call it settling a claim with a Piggyback MSA.

Before explaining the process, please allow us to first ask two simple questions:

  1. Have you ever seen a situation where an injured worker has numerous past workers’ compensation claims on file? Of course you have. Some applicants have been known to file a work comp claim against every employer they ever worked for, with several active cases still pending at the Board.
  2. Have you ever noticed a Medicare Set Aside (MSA) allocation exceeding $250,000? It is quite common. We have actually seen several allocations exceed $1 million.

With that said, if you examine the open inventory of claims on file at your office you will probably find several cases where the injured worker resolved a prior claim against a former employer where the settlement required an MSA. Let’s presume an employee settled a former claim involving a low back injury, just like the one you are currently handling. Upon settlement of that former claim, the employer funded an MSA allocation identifying the necessity of five future low back spinal cord stimulator implants, having a combined value of $525,000. However, in order to settle your claim, another MSA is now necessary. Of course, your first step is to develop an allocation. This is where we can save you a great deal of money. We recommend you compare your allocation to the one previously approved by CMS. Of course, that means you need to do your homework to obtain a copy of that prior allocation. By chance, if the applicant somehow lost the previously approved MSA paperwork, chances are a copy will still exist in the Board’s file. Once both allocations are available your goal is to search for duplicative future medical services. For example, suppose both allocations identify a need for 5 future low back spinal cord stimulator implants. Since these services were already funded in the previous MSA, there is no need for you to fund them again. Simply piggyback on the prior MSA. You just saved yourself $525,000. It’s as easy as that. In fact, you can piggyback on all duplicative medical services currently funded under the claimant’s prior MSA. Just take your time and explain everything in detail to CMS when seeking approval of your piggyback allocation. All parties, including CMS, should agree there is no legitimate reason for identical future medical procedures to be funded twice under two separate MSAs.

Category: Legal, Seminar, Workers' Compensation

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « UR and IMR Decisions: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: Destroying a Claims Department: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in