• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

March 19, 2025 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

We are somewhat confident that most claims professionals are aware the law requires utilization review (UR) to issue a decision within five business days of receipt of a request for authorization (RFA).  It’s called the five-day rule.  However, the amount of litigation occurring over interpretation of this rule is absolutely mind boggling.   We are not joking when we say that parties are continuously going to the Board over the issue of how to count to five.  Allow us to explain.

The five-day rule is rather easy to explain.  When a physician submits a prospective or concurrent RFA then pursuant to LC § 4610(i)(1), UR has up to five business days to respond.  That sounds simple enough.  However, three issues are often raised questioning how UR counted to five:

  1. Is the day of receipt of the RFA considered day one? Case law clearly states the date of receipt is not day one.  Instead, the first business day after the RFA is received is day one.  However, if an RFA is received past 5:30pm (pacific time) it is considered received the following business day, except in cases of expedited or concurrent review (CCR 9792.9.1(a)(1)). 
  2. What is a business day? Labor Code §4600.4(b) provides the following definition: “(A) ‘normal business day’ does not include Saturday, Sunday, or any day that is declared by the Governor to be an official state holiday or a holiday listed on the Department of Human Resources internet website.”  Prior to 1/1/2020 a major dispute existed over whether Saturday counted as a business day, but all that changed when California adopted Labor Code §4600.4(b), effective 1/1/2020, specifically excluding Saturday as a business day. 
  3. What holidays are recognized as non-business days?  In workers’ compensation only state holidays (as opposed to federal holidays) are considered non-business days.  Official state holidays are defined as follows:
    • as those days published by the California Department of Human Resources on their website at https://www.calhr.ca.gov/employees/Pages/state-holiday.aspx
    • any day declared a state holiday by the Governor. 

When proceeding to the board on a five-days rule dispute, we recommend that the claims administrator present a guide for the judge to reference using the following format:

Aug 29, WednesdayProspective review RFA received after 5:30pm via fax
Aug 30, ThursdayRFA legal receipt date
Aug 31, FridayDay One
Sept 1, SaturdayWeekend
Sept 2, SundayWeekend
Sept 3, MondayHoliday – Labor Day
Sept 4, TuesdayDay Two
Sept 5, WednesdayDay Three
Sept 6, ThursdayDay Four
Sept 7, FridayDay Five – Decision Issued; faxed & mailed that day to physician, applicant attorney and applicant

In the above example one can easily understand why there has been so much litigation over the timeliness of UR decisions.  Here we have an RFA that was faxed to the claims administrator on Wednesday, Aug. 29th where a decision was not issued until Friday, Sept 7th, and yet, the UR determination was still timely.  Be prepared to prove timeliness because the burden of proof falls on the administrator.

We at F+B hope we have clarified how to count to five as workers’ compensation looks seriously at timeliness of UR decisions.  If there are any questions, please feel free to contact the experts here at Friedman + Bartoumian.

Category: 60-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Legal, Seminar, Workers' CompensationTag: California Labor Code, Five-Day Rule, Labor Code, WCAB, Work Comp, Workers' Compensation, Workers' Compensation Claims, Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' Compensation Defense

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in