• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

Red Flag UR Decisions: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

February 28, 2024 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

When industrial compensability is in dispute, either for an entire injury or for just a body part, claims administrators should act cautiously should a Request for Authority (RFA) be received. The RFA is not to be addressed by utilization review (UR).  Instead, pursuant to Labor Code §4610(l)&(m) and C.C.R. 9792.9.1(b)(1), the administrator should respond within 5 workdays deferring UR until after the issue of compensability is determined. 

A claims administrator takes an unnecessary risk when sending an RFA to UR for response in a claim where injury or a body part is in dispute.  Should UR authorize the requested treatment, case law requires the services be provided despite the denial of liability.  On the other hand, should UR deny the requested treatment, then the injured worker may appeal the denial to Independent Medical Review (IMR), where if overruled, the services must be provided despite the denial of compensability.

Have you ever wondered what happens if in a disputed claim the administrator decides not to respond to an RFA?  Fortunately, should the administrator not o anything, the issue is not forfeited.  However, should compensability later be resolved in favor of the injured worker, UR will not be allowed to address the issue because the RFA was never deferred.  In other words, by failing to issue a deferral to all parties in interest, the administrator gives up their right to conduct utilization review later.

A few years ago, an applicant attorney raised an interesting but unsuccessful challenge at the Board.  He argued that where services involving a disputed injury were submitted to UR, which then addressed but denied the requested services, the administrator’s act of addressing the RFA waived the denial of liability, like what occurs when UR approves an RFA in a disputed claim.  Fortunately, applicant attorney was unsuccessful in this argument.

The best practice when dealing with an RFA on a denied injury or disputed body part is to issue a timely deferral to avoid the multitude of problems that may arise should the RFA be submitted to UR for response. For additional details or assistance with RFA and UR issues feel free to reach out to experts here at F+B!

Category: 60-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Legal, Seminar, Workers' CompensationTag: IMR, Independent Medical Review, Labor Code, Request for Authority, RFA, Utilization Review, WCAB, Work Comp, Workers' Compensation, Workers' Compensation Claims, Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' Compensation Defense

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Claims Adjuster Fraud: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: The Show Me Defense: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in