• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

The Wimpy Syndrome: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

January 17, 2024 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

Have you ever heard of the “Wimpy Syndrome”? It occurs every few years when our state legislature considers workers’ compensation reform. The Wimpy Syndrome is named after a fictional cartoon character prominently featured in the original Popeye the Sailor comic strips of the 1930’s.

J. Wellington “Wimpy” is a gourmet of the finest hamburgers money can buy, but alas, poor Wimpy is often flat-broke without a dime to his name. Undeterred by his financial problems Wimpy sets out to approach managers of fine dining establishments where he proffers his famous catch phrase, “I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.”

Whenever we have major reform in workers’ compensation, proponents on behalf of injured workers demand that new laws provide immediate and swift relief.  In exchange, they offer offsetting relief to employers to go into effect at some future date.  In other words, “they will gladly pay the employer Tuesday for a hamburger today.” Unfortunately, history has taught us a valuable lesson. Despite injured workers receiving immediate benefits, employers don’t always receive the promised offset, or if they do, a longing waiting period usually intervenes, at which time such relief is often challenged in court by applicants’ bar.

The last major reform to the workers’ compensation system occurred in 2012 under SB 863. The revisions in this legislation provided immediate relief to injured workers by providing a voucher valued at $6,000, of which $500 cash could be claimed without the necessity of submitting any receipts or explanation. In addition, the state created a “Return-to-Work Fund” where anyone with a voucher became eligible for a one-time cash payment of $5,000.  In exchange, our Independent Medical Review (IMR) system was created, scheduled to take effect six-months later on 7/1/13 for all dates of injury.  Its intent was to reduce employer litigation costs over Utilization Review disputes. As a further concession, IMR was made available only to injured workers as it prohibited employers from appealing their own UR decisions. Although the applicants’ bar gladly accepted voucher and UR reforms, they raised a constitutional challenge to IMR, but only in those cases where IMR failed to override UR. It was the Wimpy Syndrome all over again.

Prior to SB 863 the last major reform was SB 899, signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger on an emergency basis in 2004.  That bill granted injured workers immediate relief, such as being eligible for up to $10,000 in medical care while a claim remained under investigation.  In addition, a compensability investigation was required to be completed within 90 days or the injury would be deemed work-related.  Also, if an employer failed to offer a job to a worker whose injury resulted in permanent disability, the amount of disability money would be increased by 15%.  Lastly, a new “whole person” rating system was introduced to significantly raise PD values. These laws all took effect immediately upon the governor’s signature.  In exchange, employers were allowed to create MPN networks but not until six-months later.  Also, apportionment laws were re-written to take into consideration pathology and past PD awards.  As anticipated, applicants’ bar accepted the immediate increase of benefits but challenged the constitutionality of MPN networks and apportionment laws despite previous concessions. Once more, the Wimpy Syndrome was blatantly obvious.

It is anticipated that we will soon see the applicants’ bar introduce legislation seeking to immediately increase the maximum PD rate, which is currently only $290 per week.  In exchange applicant attorneys will undoubtedly offer some sort of concession to employers to take effect on some future unknown date, where it will later undoubtedly be challenged in the courts. The defense community must be vigilant as not to be tricked again. Watch out for the Wimpy Syndrome.  Any reform package must take effect immediately for both sides.

In our next blog we will discuss a recommended compromise to anticipated legislation amending the $290 per week PPD rate.

Category: 60-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Legal, Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' CompensationTag: 60-Second Seminar, 60-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, IMR, Labor Code, PD, PPD, WCAB, Work Comp, Workers' Compensation, Workers' Compensation Claims, Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' Compensation Defense

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Structured Settlements and Annuities: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: Nobody Noticed: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in