• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

Pre-Designation: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

April 12, 2023 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

It is common knowledge that most applicant attorneys view Medical Provider Networks (MPNs) as a program created for the benefit of employers. As a result, applicant attorneys do not consider MPN physicians as being unbiased but rather, they believe them to be in “cahoots” with the employer to the detriment of injured workers. After all, the employer was the one who established the MPN and selected its member physicians.  With that said, the applicant’s bar usually makes it a point to instruct workers at union meetings and other gatherings to opt-out of an MPN whenever possible by pre-designating a primary treating physician. In plain language, proper pre-designation allows an employee to escape an MPN.

Examiners are often taught that upon notice of a claim they should ask the employer if the worker pre-designated a primary care physician.  If so, the injured worker is allowed to seek treatment from the pre-designated physician, even when the physician is outside the MPN. The purpose of today’s blog is to advise employers and claims administrators that it is not enough to simply inquire if a worker pre-designated a primary care physician. The claim administrator must investigate further to determine if the pre-designation was proper. After all, accepting the validity of a designation at face value eliminates the ability of an employer to subjects the injured worker to MPN control.

The rules of pre-designation are numerous but generally simple:

  1. The pre-designation must be submitted in writing prior to the industrial injury.
  2. No particular form is required (although Form 9783 is offered by the DWC, such offer is for convenience purposes only – its use is not mandatory).
  3. The worker must have health insurance from any source at the time of industrial injury.
  4. The predesignated physician must agree to pre-designation prior to injury, but their agreement need not be in writing.
  5. The pre-designated physician must have previously directed the employee’s medical treatment and retain their medical records, including medical history.
  6. The pre-designated physician must be a “personal physician” which means the applicant’s regular physician or surgeon, including a doctor of osteopathy, licensed pursuant to Business and Professions Code 2000, et seq.
  7. A medical group, such as Kaiser or the V.A., may be designated as a personal physician provided that the group is a single corporation or partnership composed of licensed medical doctors or osteopathy that operates an integrated multispecialty medical group providing comprehensive medical serviced predominantly for nonoccupation injuries and illnesses.
  8. With respect to chiropractors:
    1. If an MPN exists, the pre-designated physician cannot be a chiropractor.
    2. If an MPN does not exist a chiropractor may be pre-designated; however, following an injury the employee must first be examined by a physician of the employer’s choice. If additional medical care is required after the initial medical visit, then the employee may request a transfer in writing to the pre-designated chiropractor for follow up treatment.

As stated earlier, a claims adjuster should verify that the pre-designation complies with the above requirements.  Any error will disqualify the pre-designation.  Employers should also be cautioned that it is a violation of LC 132a to discriminate against an employee for exercising their right to pre-designate.  Of importance, it should be noted that absent employee authorization, an employer is not allowed to contact the pre-designated physician prior to injury to verify compliance with pre-designation requirements. Also, if the pre-designated physician requires a consultation or referral to another physician, the pre-designated doctor may select a physician outside the network. However, if the referred physician should require yet another referral, then the referred physician must select someone from within the employer’s MPN.

Category: Legal, Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' CompensationTag: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, MPN, Pre-Designation, Sixty-Second Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Work Comp, Workers' Compensation, Workers' Compensation Claims, Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' Compensation Defense

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Legal Presumptions: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: Replacing the QME: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in