• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

Blaming the Claims Adjuster: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

April 20, 2022 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

Have you ever noticed how everyone seems to blame the claims adjuster whenever anything goes wrong in a file? It’s amazing how often it occurs. Let’s start with an injured worker who blames the adjuster for their injury, as if the adjuster somehow caused the accident. We know in reality the adjuster had nothing to do with it, but an injured worker often needs to blame someone. The claimant’s anger is therefore directed towards the employer’s representative, which in this case is the claims adjuster. To rationalize why the adjuster is to be blamed, injured workers come up with a variety of excuses. For example: The adjuster may be unreasonably blamed for refusing to authorize a non-certified medical procedure, found to be inappropriate by both utilization review and IMR.

It doesn’t end there. Judges have been known to unfairly blame adjusters as well. In a case we observed at the Board, a judge opened a file while commenting, “Let’s see what the adjuster did wrong this time.” Talk about being prejudiced. In another case involving an unrepresented worker, we watched as the two parties submitted settlement documents for judicial approval. While looking over the papers the judge snidely remarked, “Let’s see how many penalties I can find.” For goodness’ sake, the parties were there to amicably settle a case, but the judge preferred to focus on imaginary penalties, assuming the claims adjuster must have committed multiple errors.

It’s even worse when an employer blames the adjuster whenever there is a large settlement. It didn’t matter that a worker was seriously injured using a table-saw, where the safety guard had been deliberately removed by management, exposing a high-speed, sharp blade that sliced off four fingers. The employer blamed the adjuster for the high dollar settlement for failing to order surveillance. Well, we got news for that employer … “No amount of surveillance in the world will ever change the fact the employee lost four fingers.” The bottom line is the company refused to take responsibility for its decision to speed up production by removing a safety guard. They gambled with their employee’s safety and lost.

Claims adjusters should realize that no matter what happens in a file they will be blamed. Don’t take it personally. It’s okay. We understand and so does your employer. It reminds us of a T-shirt that says, “I didn’t say it was your fault. I said I was going to blame you.” Although it would be rather humorous to wear this shirt at work, we do suggest you fight the urge to wear it at the appeals board.

Category: Legal, Seminar, Workers' Compensation

You May Also Be Interested In:

Overriding UR: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Lump Sum PDAs: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Exceptions to the $10,000 Rule: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: New and Further Disability: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in