• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

Exceptions to the $10,000 Rule: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

April 13, 2022 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

Pursuant to LC 5402(c) an injured worker is entitled to up to $10,000 in medical benefits when compensability of a claim is on delay and/or under investigation. However, this entitlement is not automatic. There are conditions and exceptions to the $10,000 Rule.

First of all, a DWC-1 Claim Form must be on file before even a penny of that $10,000 is paid. Although most administrators are aware of the DWC-1 prerequisite, they are unfamiliar with three exceptions that exist. Let’s take a few moments to review all three.

  1. When “employment” is in dispute, the $10,000 Rule does not apply. Actually, when you think about it, this requirement makes sense. The $10,000 rule is intended to pay medical care in behalf of an injured employee, which presupposes that one must first be an employee to be entitled to this benefit. Therefore, either an “admission” or “finding of employment” must exist before any portion of the $10,000 is due.
  2. The $10,000 Rule does not apply in a psych claim where the “6-Month Rule” under LC 3208.3(d) is raised as a defense. WCAB case law implies that the $10,000 is inapplicable pursuant to the first sentence of LC 3208.3(d) which states: “Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, no compensation shall be paid pursuant to this division for a psychiatric injury related to a claim against an employer unless the employee has been employed by that employer for at least six months.” (LC 3208.3(d) and LC 5402(c) are both found under Division 4 of the Labor Code.)
  3. The $10,000 Rule does not apply in a psych claim where a defense is raised under the “Non-Discriminatory, Good Faith Personnel Action Rule” pursuant to LC 3208.3(h). Once again, WCAB case law implies that the $10,000 Rule is inapplicable as the first sentence of LC 3208.3(h) states: “No compensation under this division shall be paid by an employer for a psychiatric injury if the injury was substantially caused by a lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action.” (LC 3208.3(b) and LC 5402(c) are both found under Division 4 of the Labor Code.)

Most claims administrators are only aware of the DWC-1 exception to the $10,000 Rule. Now, after reading this sixty-second blog they are aware of three additional exceptions. As a side note, each of the three $10,000 exceptions mentioned above, also act as an exception to the 90-day time limit to issue a compensability decision, regardless of whether a DWC-1 is on file.

Category: Legal, Seminar, Workers' Compensation

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « The Incarcerated Worker: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: Blaming the Claims Adjuster: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in