• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

The Show Me Defense: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

March 6, 2024 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

Arguably, the two most powerful words in workers’ compensation are “show me.”  All too often opposing counsel will offer their interpretation of the law in an attempt to further an argument at the Board.  When this occurs, it is vital for the defense to simply say, ‘show me.’  In other words, “prove it.”

It is amazing how much poker is figuratively played at the appeals board when one side attempts to bluff another.  Whenever someone makes a valid point, they often prove their opinion without being asked by offering case law citation.  Otherwise, they are probably bluffing.

Sometimes an applicant attorney will invent a fictional citation or perhaps reference an actual case law decision that is not exactly on point.  Also, counsel may embellish their interpretation of case law to suit their needs.  Keep in mind that just because case law may exist does not necessarily mean it addressed the issue in dispute.  On the other hand, there are times when referenced case law is exactly on point but the decision may no longer be germane as the law has since changed or been repealed.  Opposing counsel may either be unaware of it or is hoping you won’t notice.  As a result, an employer has to be on their toes at all times and familiar with case law as it exists today.

All too often applicant attorneys will state their understanding of the law and request the defendants prove otherwise if they disagree.  This is a trap.  Don’t fall it.  Put the burden back on the opposing counsel to prove their interpretation of the law.  Don’t be the least bit bashful to say, “Show me.”  The burden of proof is always on the party asserting the positive.  It is never up to the defendant to disprove an unsupported argument.  However, once proof is provided, then the defendant must do their homework to verify if the referenced authority does indeed prove applicant’s point.  It would be incumbent on the defendant to conduct research since workers’ compensation case law contains many contradictory decisions.  The challenge is to locate those decisions supporting the employer’s position.  Once again, nothing begins until after the magic words “show me” are raised.  Otherwise, whatever is being offered is nothing more than an unsupported opinion or in many cases, wishful thinking.  So, if you are spending far too much time trying to disprove applicant attorney’s interpretation of the law, come over to Friedman + Bartoumian where we gladly will put the onus on counsel to request proof of their argument.  In other words, we aren’t the least bit afraid to “call their bluff.”

Category: 60-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Legal, Seminar, Workers' Compensation

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Red Flag UR Decisions: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: Double Vouchers: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in