• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

Defending Conditional Payment Claims: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

August 10, 2022 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

It is safe to presume that every administrator of claims for workers’ compensation benefits is aware of the government’s right to seek reimbursement of Medicare Conditional Payments. These payments are known as Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) claims and are asserted by Medicare Secondary Payer Recovery Contractors (MSPRC) who seek reimbursement in the federal government’s behalf.

Unfortunately, claims administrators are experiencing a two-fold problem with MSP reimbursement demands:

  1. MSP claims seek reimbursement for all medical services, including those unrelated to the industrial injury.
  2. The reimbursement demand is often issued beyond expiration of the statute of limitations.

When MSPRC becomes aware of a workers’ compensation claim, they produce a printout of all medical services paid by Medicare to and on behalf of the claimant. They then seek reimbursement of the services listed on the printout and leave it up to the work comp claims administrator to weed out those that are unrelated to the industrial injury. Many administrators simply pay everything rather than scrutinize the printout for accuracy. They also have no desire to get into a dispute with the U.S. Government.

Another typical scenario finds the MSPRC seeking reimbursement for services after the expiration of the statute of limitations. Unfortunately, most claims professionals are totally unaware that a federal statute of limitations even exists. It’s difficult enough for claims reps to keep track of the ever-changing state work comp laws and regulations without adding federal statutes to the mix. In that regard, per the Strengthening Medicare and Repaying Taxpayers Act of 2012 (SMART Act), effective July 10, 2013, the statute of limitations in an MSP claim is three years from the date of the Medicare payment, and any demand for payment beyond the three-year statute is non-reimbursable.

To recap, an MSP contractor will often issue reimbursement demand letters for all medical services paid, including those unrelated to the industrial injury, as well as for services beyond the statute of limitations, leaving it up to the claims administrator to determine what is reimbursable. The amount of money inappropriately claimed by the MSPRC has reached an alarming stage where claims adjuster diligence is required now more than ever. It has been said that had these reimbursement demands originated from any entity other than the U.S. Government, such claims would likely never have been asserted!

Category: Legal, Seminar, Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers' Compensation Claims Handling, Workers' Compensation

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Benefit Printouts: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: QME Strike Procedures: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in