• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us today for help!  (818) 707-1488

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Friedman + Bartoumian

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
    • Business Litigation
    • Insurance Law
    • Employment and Labor Law
    • General Liability Defense
  • Attorneys
    • Heywood G. Friedman, Founder and Managing Partner
    • Haik K. Bartoumian, Senior Partner
    • All Attorneys
  • Testimonials
  • Legal Art
  • Serving the Community
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Search

Contact Us Today!

If you see lawyers who are ready and able to collaborate with you to find positive solutions to your legal concerns, you should contact us.

(818) 707-1480

The Two-Year Rule (LC 4661.5): A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

March 2, 2022 //  by Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian//  Leave a Comment

When TD benefits are paid more than two years from the date of injury, the claims administrator is required pursuant to LC 4661.5 to verify if the benefit rate should increase. However, this requirement only applies if the injured worker is a maximum or minimum earner.

Exactly how does the two-year rule work? The best way to answer this question is by example. Suppose a maximum earner is injured on 12/14/20. On 12/24/22 a TD payment will be issued paying two weeks’ disability from 12/10/22 to 12/24/22. Because the check will be issued beyond two years from the date of injury, the administrator must determine if the TD rate should be increased. If an increase is in order, the entire payment is to be made at the new higher TD rate. The administrator should not pay 4 days at the old rate and 10 days at the new rate. Again, if the “date of payment” is beyond two years from the date of injury, then the entire payment is subject to the new rate.

What will happen eight days later on January 1, 2023 if this employee remains on TD? Must the administrator once again verify if the worker is eligible for yet another rate increase? The answer is: “Yes, if there is a new maximum rate effective 1/1/23, then the TD is subject to yet another rate increase, even though an increase occurred only eight days earlier.” Before applying any rate increase it is important for the administrator to verify if the injured worker still qualifies for the increase. Just because someone was a maximum earner in 2020 does not necessarily mean they are a still maximum earner in 2022 or later. Keep in mind the TD rate is still calculated at 2/3 the average weekly wage subject to the maximum and minimum weekly benefit applicable for that payment.

One final comment: Suppose an employee filed a claim for a 2015 injury where liability was denied. Now seven years later in 2022 the matter proceeds to trial and the injury is ruled compensable. Retroactive TD is ordered to be paid from 2015 to 2017. Because payment is being issued well beyond two years from the date of injury, the TD rate will be calculated at 2/3 the AWW subject to the maximum rate applicable in 2022, not 2015. Ouch!  By the way, in this example don’t forget to reduce the payment to the injured worker by the amount of any EDD benefits paid. Although EDD is entitled to reimbursement plus interest, they are not entitled to the higher LC 4661.5 rate. The LC 4661.5 increase is to be paid to the worker.

Category: Legal, Seminar, Workers' Compensation

You May Also Be Interested In:

The Five-Day Rule: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Creating Needless Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Imputed Knowledge: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Claims Forfeiture: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

The Self-Insurance Exam: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

EAMS Case Search: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Requesting an Additional QME: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Occupational Adjustment: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Terrorism Claims: A 60-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling

Previous Post: « Reserve Redundancy Reports: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling
Next Post: Benefit Notices: A Sixty-Second Seminar in Workers’ Compensation Claims Handling »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Practice Areas

  • Workers’ Compensation Claims Defense
  • Business Litigation
  • Insurance Law
  • Employment and Labor Law
  • General Liability Defense

Our Offices

Los Angeles
Orange County
Bay Area
Sacramento
Fresno
Contact Us Today →

Contact Us

Contact our legal office today. Our attorneys are ready to fight for you. There is no time better than now.
Contact Us Today →

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Newsletter

Sign up to get free resources, tips, and directory of our firm.

  • Legal Blog
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Serving the Community

Site Footer

This website may be used for informational purposes only. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No one should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information in this website without seeking the appropriate legal and professional counsel on his or her particular circumstances. The operation of this website and the transmission of information via this website are not intended to and do not create a confidential or attorney-client relationship. Any communications with The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, via Internet e-mail or through this website contain the security limits inherent to standard e-mail and should not be considered secure or confidential. While The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, hopes that the information contained in this website are useful as general information or background material, and while the contents of the Website are updated regularly, it cannot offer a warranty that the information is current, accurate, or applicable to any given situation. ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE DISCLAIMED. By the information within this website, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not hold itself out as qualified to practice law in any state, territory, or country other than those in which its attorneys are actually qualified. Additionally, The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based on viewing this website in a state, territory, or country in which this website does not comply with the applicable laws and ethical rules of that state. Links – This website may contain links to third-party websites. These third-party websites are not under the control of The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, and The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian, is in no way responsible for the contents of any linked websites or any links contained in such websites. Links to third-party websites are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement of the linked website by The Law Firm of Friedman + Bartoumian.

Copyright © 2025 · Website Design By Ali Lapidus · Log in